Send us the AI-built MVP that needs a senior engineering review.
This form is only for vibe-coded, AI-built, no-code, low-code, or mixed-code MVPs that need production hardening, security review, workflow repair, or a rebuild-versus-refactor decision.
A practical rescue readout, not a vague code review.
The goal is to help you decide what to fix first, what can wait, and whether the current foundation deserves more investment.
Risk summary
A plain-English overview of the biggest product, security, architecture, data, integration, and deployment risks we see.
Severity ranking
Launch blockers, high-risk issues, medium-risk cleanup, and lower-priority improvements separated so you know what matters first.
Fix plan
A prioritized path for auth, RBAC, Supabase RLS or database policy gaps, Stripe states, webhooks, backups, logs, and deployment permissions.
Rebuild or refactor call
A recommendation on whether to harden what exists, refactor the risky pieces, or stop investing in the current codebase.
Next sprint estimate
A practical estimate for the first stabilization sprint, including what should be tackled before pilots, customers, or investors rely on the app.
Decision clarity
You leave with a clearer answer to the founder question: keep building, pause for hardening, refactor the foundation, or rebuild the product correctly.