Select Sidearea

Populate the sidearea with useful widgets. It’s simple to add images, categories, latest post, social media icon links, tag clouds, and more.

Contact The SaaS Masters

Talk with us about your SaaS build, broken MVP, AI-built prototype, or product roadmap.

Your personal data will be used to support your experience throughout this website, to manage access to your account, and for other purposes described in our privacy policy.

Codebase rescue audit

Send us the AI-built MVP that needs a senior engineering review.

This form is only for vibe-coded, AI-built, no-code, low-code, or mixed-code MVPs that need production-grade hardening, compliance-aware security review, workflow repair, or a rebuild-versus-refactor decision.

What you receive

A practical rescue readout, not a vague code review.

The goal is to help you decide what to fix first, what can wait, and whether the current foundation deserves more investment.

Risk summary

A plain-English overview of the biggest product, security, architecture, data, integration, and deployment risks we see.

Severity ranking

Launch blockers, high-risk issues, medium-risk cleanup, and lower-priority improvements separated so you know what matters first.

Fix plan

A prioritized path for auth, RBAC, Supabase RLS or database policy gaps, Stripe states, webhooks, backups, logs, and deployment permissions.

Rebuild or refactor call

A recommendation on whether to harden what exists, refactor the risky pieces, or stop investing in the current codebase.

Next sprint estimate

A practical estimate for the first stabilization sprint, including what should be tackled before pilots, customers, or investors rely on the app.

Decision clarity

You leave with a clearer answer to the founder question: keep building, pause for hardening, refactor the foundation, or rebuild the product correctly.

Scanner report to production-grade hardening

A scanner report is not a rescue plan. A senior engineering review turns it into one.

Founders do not need another long list of warnings. They need to know what threatens users, revenue, data, launch credibility, and maintainability first.

Scanners find signals

Useful scanners can flag exposed keys, missing headers, weak policies, dependency noise, and obvious configuration risks. That is a starting point.

We rank business risk

We decide what can leak data, bypass payment, break tenant boundaries, expose admin actions, corrupt records, or make the product unsafe to launch.

Then we fix the foundation

We harden auth, RBAC/RLS, Stripe states, admin routes, secrets, deployment, backups, logging, data flow, and the code paths that real users will depend on.

Blunt version: we do not sell security theater or unsupported compliance guarantees. We help make the product production-grade, compliance-aware, and much harder to break before users trust it.

What feels risky?